Secure production lines and embedded AI without disrupting safety or availability.
Connect asset discovery, SBOM, firmware, vulnerability, supplier, and plant telemetry to risk, remediation, and change-control evidence.
Sector problems
Regulations and frameworks
Mappings help you collect and organize evidence. An assessor, examiner, auditor, or authorizing official still decides whether the obligation is met. The platform does not certify an organization or file a regulatory notice.
| Framework | What it asks for | How the platform helps |
|---|---|---|
| IEC 62443Official source ↗ | Secure industrial automation and control systems across zones and conduits. | OT, manufacturing, and controller workflows map exposure and segmentation findings to IEC 62443. |
| NIST SP 800-82Official source ↗ | Apply OT security guidance without unsafe testing. | Passive discovery and a plant digital twin support assessment and recovery planning. |
| Robot safety standards | Industrial and service robots have safety duties that security work must not bypass. | Robotics reviews sit alongside IEC 62443. Actions that could move equipment wait for a named person. |
| CMMC and NIST SP 800-171Official source ↗ | Defense manufacturers and suppliers protect FCI and CUI at the level the contract requires. | CMMC preparation collects evidence and drafts the SSP and POA&M for the senior official. Confirm the assessment type in the current solicitation. |
| Software supply chainOfficial source ↗ | Customers and federal buyers expect software bills of materials and vendor-risk evidence. | Supply-chain workflows ingest and generate CycloneDX or SPDX bills of materials and correlate components with known exploited vulnerabilities. |
Typical workflows
These workflows show how documented capabilities apply. They are not customer case studies, and they do not describe a guaranteed outcome.
supply-chain risk · firmware integrity · robotics security · embedded AI attribution · OT remediation
Select the installed agents and test their models, tools, permissions, and connectors before authorizing the mission. The available catalog depends on your deployment and release.
Agent verification and testing →NIST SP 800-82 · IEC 62443 · ISO 27001 · NIST CSF · customer safety controls
Set applicability for your assets, jurisdictions, and system boundaries. Connect control owners, current policies, technical tests, exceptions, and review decisions.
Explore regulatory evidence workflows →01
Define the customer profile, authorized assets, and responsible owners. Secure production lines and embedded AI without disrupting safety or availability.
02
Use supply-chain risk, firmware integrity, robotics security workflows with approved credentials and mission limits. Preserve source evidence and failures alongside findings.
03
Assign corrective work, obtain approvals, capture changes, and retest. Export the evidence, exceptions, and status history for business owners and assessors.
Questions for this sector
Yes. Assessments are evidence-only by default, and the safe profile uses passive protocol identification without fuzzing or broadcast storms.
Actions that are physical, operational-technology, or actuation stay behind human approval. Agents cannot act outside the capability envelope they were given.
Yes. Preparation workflows collect evidence against the in-scope NIST SP 800-171 requirements and draft the system security plan and plan of action for approval. They do not certify the supplier.
Yes. Supply-chain workflows ingest and generate CycloneDX and SPDX bills of materials and correlate components with known exploited vulnerabilities.
