Security and GRC for banks, lenders, fintech, digital wallets, stablecoins, and blockchain operations.
Correlate fraud, sanctions, AML/KYC, wallet, identity, cloud, code, and transaction signals into one evidence-backed risk picture with approval-gated response.
Sector problems
Regulations and frameworks
Mappings help you collect and organize evidence. An assessor, examiner, auditor, or authorizing official still decides whether the obligation is met. The platform does not certify an organization or file a regulatory notice.
| Framework | What it asks for | How the platform helps |
|---|---|---|
| GLBA and the FTC Safeguards RuleOfficial source ↗ | Protect customer financial information under a written information security program. | Safeguards evidence, email protection, and AI firewall controls keep customer data out of unapproved prompts. |
| PCI DSSOfficial source ↗ | Protect cardholder data, including logging, secure development, and testing requirements in the current standard. | Assessment, code analysis, application testing, and log workflows map findings to the requirements in scope. |
| NYDFS Part 500Official source ↗ | Maintain a cybersecurity program, including MFA, asset inventory, and incident notification on the regulator's clock. | Inventory, identity-threat detection, and incident timelines support the program. People still make and file notices. |
| FFIEC IT examination expectationsOfficial source ↗ | The FFIEC retired its Cybersecurity Assessment Tool on 31 August 2025. Examiners point institutions to resources such as NIST CSF 2.0, the CRI Profile, CIS Controls, and CISA performance goals. | Evidence maps to NIST CSF 2.0 and the IT examination handbook rather than a retired CAT score. |
| BSA/AML and sanctionsOfficial source ↗ | Monitor transactions, know the customer, screen sanctions, and file suspicious activity reports when required. | AML and KYC workflows screen sanctions lists, rate customer risk, and draft SAR content for a compliance officer. A person decides whether to file. |
| SWIFT CSP, SOX, and DORAOfficial source ↗ | Attest to SWIFT customer security controls, support IT general controls over financial reporting, and, for EU financial entities, manage ICT risk under DORA. | Payment-rail tests, control evidence, resilience exercises, and third-party reviews produce packages for the owner who attests or reports. |
Typical workflows
These workflows show how documented capabilities apply. They are not customer case studies, and they do not describe a guaranteed outcome.
fraud detection · AML/KYC · sanctions screening · credit review · blockchain and wallet monitoring · AI governance
Select the installed agents and test their models, tools, permissions, and connectors before authorizing the mission. The available catalog depends on your deployment and release.
Agent verification and testing →SOX · GLBA · PCI DSS · AML/KYC obligations · FFIEC-style controls · NIST AI RMF
Set applicability for your assets, jurisdictions, and system boundaries. Connect control owners, current policies, technical tests, exceptions, and review decisions.
Explore regulatory evidence workflows →01
Define the customer profile, authorized assets, and responsible owners. Security and GRC for banks, lenders, fintech, digital wallets, stablecoins, and blockchain operations.
02
Use fraud detection, AML/KYC, sanctions screening workflows with approved credentials and mission limits. Preserve source evidence and failures alongside findings.
03
Assign corrective work, obtain approvals, capture changes, and retest. Export the evidence, exceptions, and status history for business owners and assessors.
Questions for this sector
Evidence workflows cover GLBA safeguards, SOX IT general controls, PCI DSS, NYDFS Part 500, FFIEC examination expectations, NCUA cybersecurity duties where they apply, BSA/AML and sanctions screening, SWIFT customer security controls, DORA for EU operations, and NIST CSF 2.0. A mapping is not an examination result.
The FFIEC retired that tool on 31 August 2025. Current workflows map evidence to NIST CSF 2.0 and the FFIEC IT examination handbook.
No. It can pre-fill a draft for compliance-officer review. A person decides whether to file and what to file.
The financial pack can use core-banking and payment-rail connectors, including processors, card networks, and sanctions or BSA feeds, where that connector is enabled in the deployment. Availability is verified per tenant.
